Key findings
- Manual ESG assessment can take up to four hours per risk, making portfolio-wide underwriting inefficient.
- ESG scores show a positive correlation with underwriting performance, especially in property insurance.
- Nature-related and climate-related risks are material but difficult to assess without consistent, localized data.
- Veridion’s weekly updated ESG data adds visibility into environmental, social, and governance risk signals, including SMBs.
Overview
What this report covers
A June 2024 whitepaper on how ESG data improves commercial underwriting by reducing manual effort, improving risk materiality assessment, and supporting better pricing and coverage decisions.
4 hrsunderwriters spend manually assessing each ESG risk (Better Insurance Network)
$9Bin premiums studied linking ESG ratings to underwriting performance (Howden & Fidelis)
$10.5B3M settlement over PFAS contamination liability
Inside the report
Questions this report answers
- Why is ESG risk assessment still a four-hour, data-starved manual process?
- How strongly do ESG ratings actually correlate with underwriting loss ratios?
- How do nature and climate risks translate into real underwriting exposure?
- What does a single chemical manufacturer’s hidden ESG profile reveal at renewal? (case study)
- How does weekly-updated ESG data sharpen pricing on hard-to-cover SMBs?
Over half of insurers and re-insurers believe that nature-related risk is material to their underwriting business, yet nature risk is not being assessed by underwriters.
Contents
What’s inside
- Why ESG risk assessment is so burdensome today
- The correlation between ESG risk and underwriting performance
- ESG risk materiality in commercial insurance
- Mitigating catastrophic and nature-related risk
- Case study: evaluating a true risk profile with Veridion ESG data
Get the report
Read the full 20-page report
Download the full research, ready to reference or share with your team.
