Skip to main content

Solutions / Vendor Data Management

All the data your vendor master needs. Live and intelligent.

135M operating companies. 507M legal entities. 166M locations. Refreshed continuously. Build your vendor master on the Veridion graph: every supplier resolved, every parent group rolled up, every attribute carrying provenance.

  • Snowflake
  • Pwc
  • Promena
  • Pepsico
  • Morningstar
  • Marketdojo

Trusted by global intelligence, risk, and procurement teams

135MOperating companies
507MLegal entities
166MPhysical addresses
1.3BProducts and services
Firmographics120+ attributes
Ownership4-layer hierarchy
LocationsBuilding-level
Products and servicesUNSPSC + L3
TechnographicsCRM / ERP / cloud
ESG signalsScores + GHG
Supply chainMulti-tier links
News and eventsDaily

The data foundation

A 360-degree view on every company in the world.

Operating company data from four hundred sources, refreshed at the cadence each attribute demands. Every field carries provenance, every record resolves to an ultimate parent.

ContinuousCore graph

Firmographics, locations, ownership, classifications, products. The whole graph refreshes continuously.

DailyVolatile signals

News, operational signals, executive moves, certain risk flags. Daily refresh on the fast-moving layer.

Rolling 90-dayTechnographics

CRM, ERP, cloud, analytics, marketing, commerce. Detected stack rolls forward on a 90-day cycle.

Under 24 hoursPipeline latency

End-to-end from source crawl to resolved attribute. Provenance, confidence, last_verified on every field.

From messy to mastered

Your master, rolled up to ultimate parent.

Duplicates resolve against the live graph. Subsidiaries pull up to ultimate parent. Internal vendor IDs from P2P, ERP, AP, and GRC stay in place as bridge keys on every record.

Records in

Bulk + delta

Vendor records flow in from your P2P, ERP, AP, and GRC systems.

Match V6

95%+ match

Each record matches against the live graph; confidence drives auto-merge or review-queue.

Dedup

Auto-merge

Duplicates collapse into a single canonical record; review-queue catches the rest.

Rollup

4-layer

Subsidiaries pull up to ultimate parent; consolidated spend surfaces by group.

Resolution

Duplicate records collapse against the live graph. Match V6 confidence drives auto-merge / review-queue / human-research routing.

Rollup

Subsidiaries pull up to ultimate parent. Consolidated spend surfaces the view AP and procurement teams have been missing.

Bridge keys

Internal vendor IDs from P2P, ERP, AP, and GRC stay in place. Veridion is the canonical join key, not a replacement system of record.

While you were not looking

Your master, kept current.

Your vendor master stays current on its own. Every change is caught as it happens and arrives with the provenance your audit needs.

SolarTech GmbH, 2025

Vendor created in master

Jan 2025

First detection via Handelsregister Munich. Match V6 confidence 94%. Internal P2P ID bound to the canonical org_id.

Hover to pause
nameSolarTech GmbH
addressMaximilianstr. 8, Munich
registrationHRB 284721
p2p_id7821
Live across your master.
pipeline latency under 24h

Build on

What your vendor master can do with Veridion.

Six capabilities your master picks up the moment it sits on the live graph. Operate them in-house, or layer them between Veridion and your customers as a product.

What this means for you

Questions your vendor master can now answer.

Hyper-clean records first. Then proper analytics, live updates, and risk exposure on the same graph.

Master data steward

Where are my duplicate records and rolled-up subsidiaries across the master?

NeedsMatch V6 + bridge keys + parent-group rollup

Which vendor records are missing core fields or carrying low-confidence values that auto-merge cannot accept?

NeedsPer-attribute confidence + source URL on every field

Across my P2P, ERP, AP, and GRC systems, are vendor IDs consistent for the same supplier on every read?

NeedsCanonical join key (org_id) bridged to every system's internal vendor ID

What is my master's overall match confidence right now, and how has it moved in the last 30 days?

NeedsMatch confidence per record, last_verified per attribute
Procurement

What is my consolidated spend per ultimate parent, not per legal entity I happen to invoice?

NeedsCorporate Groups V1 + ultimate_parent_id rollup

Which of my top vendors closed or went dormant in the last quarter without telling me?

NeedsOperational signals + financial-distress flags + news layer

Who are the emerging competitors to my top 5 vendors I should be qualifying as alternates?

NeedsSearch V4 across the 642M universe + lookalike ranking

Which of my vendors restructured, moved their operations, or changed leadership since my last category review?

NeedsLocations + ownership + executive moves on a daily refresh
Risk and compliance

Which of my vendors have new sanctions exposure, financial-distress, or ESG breach signals this week?

NeedsDaily news + Early Warning Signals + ESG event stream

Which vendors have or lack the certifications I require across my master?

NeedsProducts L3 certifications

Where am I over-concentrated by geography or parent group, and which alternates qualify?

NeedsLocations + corporate hierarchy + Search V4 lookalikes

Which of my vendors changed ultimate ownership in the last 30 days, and what does that do to my exposure?

NeedsOwnership graph traversal + Corporate Groups V1

The lifecycle

Source. Manage. Monitor. One data layer underneath all three.

Vendor management is step 2. Supplier sourcing handles pre-contract discovery. Third-party risk catches the failures that re-open the loop. The same vendor IDs travel across all three.

FAQ

Vendor data management, answered.

Next step

Bring your vendor master to the data layer underneath it.

Run a head-to-head data-quality audit on a defined subset of your master. Attribute fill-rate delta, dedup-candidate count, parent-group rollup count, refresh-cadence comparison.

Solutions

Explore other solutions

Each workflow runs on the same living company intelligence. Pick the one closest to your team's problem.