Better data: v6 is built on a fundamentally richer entity data model, with legal entities linked to their operational counterparts, subsidiaries connected to parents, and corporate groups connecting multiple entities. Each result is a unified profile combining the registered legal record (legal name, jurisdiction, registry identifiers) with operational details (website, locations, contacts, and business activity). Inputs and weighting: send any combination of five signals, name, address, website, phone, and registry ID. The API weighs them by reliability: registry IDs and verified domains are strongest, first-party website data outranks directories, an exact match beats a fuzzy one unless several signals corroborate it, and corporate-group membership is used to disambiguate when multiple candidates remain. What it can resolve: every response carries a resolution object (a scenario label plus a plain-language summary), across eight scenarios: - direct: a clean single match (Kraft Heinz Company with its address) - inferred: an interpreted match, such as a company registered in one jurisdiction but operating in another (DuPont, incorporated in Delaware), or a brand resolved to its main entity (Google with google.com to Google LLC) - group_proxy: a local entity reached through corporate-group structure with no name match (LVMH plus Romania to Somarest SRL) - conflict: contradictory signals detected and resolved on the most trustworthy evidence (a legal name and a website that belong to different companies) - historical: renamed, merged, acquired, or redirected identities traced forward (sungard.com now redirecting to fisglobal.com) - ambiguity: up to five ranked candidates when the input is too generic to narrow safely - intent: the group is understood but no safe entity exists, so intent is confirmed with no company returned (Nestle plus Iceland) - unresolved: no coherent company could be identified Match transparency: each returned company includes a confidence score from 0 to 1 and per-field match details showing which attributes matched, the match type (exact, partial, or approximate), and the source (for example legal versus commercial name, or registered versus operational address). Address agreement is graded from country down to region, city, postcode, street, street number, and coordinates; a brand on a different country domain (acme.com versus acme.fr) still scores as a strong website match; and a domain that now redirects elsewhere is followed automatically. The score can be boosted by group-level structural confirmation, so a group_proxy match like Somarest scores strongly despite no name overlap. Responses return the best match plus up to four ranked alternatives, each with its operational footprint such as total locations. Built to be: deterministic (the same input always returns the same answer, with no learned models drifting), conservative (when evidence is weak it returns ambiguous or intent-only rather than a confident wrong answer), and explainable (every result is traceable to the signals and resolution behind it). Available as a single synchronous call at POST https://data.veridion.com/match/v6/companies; v5 is unaffected.
Impact: Match & Enrich consumers who want higher resolution accuracy, group/brand awareness, and per-result explainability.