Skip to main content

Solutions / Commercial Insurance

The operational truth layer for commercial insurance.

135M operating companies, classified and continuously refreshed. One data contract for underwriting, pricing, claims, and fraud.

  • Snowflake
  • Pwc
  • Promena
  • Pepsico
  • Morningstar
  • Marketdojo

Trusted by global intelligence, risk, and procurement teams

The gap

Every function runs on data that goes stale.

Registries tell you what a business once was. Loss history tells you what it once cost. Pick your role and see where the gap shows up in the work.

Application data goes stale the moment it is filed.

Submissions land on registry profiles that are already out of date. Underwriters spend roughly 14 hours a week validating long-tail SMBs, and premium adequacy drifts silently between bind and renewal.

Our strong point

Continuous refresh across 135M operating companies. SMB long tail included.

Blind spots

Questions only Veridion can answer

Each one goes dark on registry or loss-history data alone.

Underwriter

How many logistics insureds opened a new warehouse this quarter that isn't on the schedule?

NeedsLocation intelligence + continuous refresh

Which insured manufacturers added lithium-ion or hazardous product lines in the last six months?

NeedsProduct granularity + digital footprint scanning

What share of my active construction companies are still operating, not dormant or shell?

NeedsDormancy signals + digital footprint verification

How many insureds had a material ownership change in the last 180 days nobody flagged?

NeedsRegistry + digital-footprint ownership fusion
CUO & Product

What share of my portfolio is misclassified because NAICS codes went stale since bind?

NeedsMulti-taxonomy classification + change detection

If I re-underwrote my SMB book on current data, how much would need a material adjustment?

NeedsRe-match against the live 135M operating universe

Can I auto-classify and bind embedded-insurance SMBs at 95%+ without manual review?

NeedsMatch & Enrich + confidence scores per field
Actuarial & Pricing

What share of my restaurant insureds operate secondary locations missing from our records?

NeedsLocation intelligence + multi-site mapping

How many workers-comp insureds had headcount shift 30%+ since last renewal?

NeedsFirmographic change detection + continuous refresh

How many low-risk-coded insureds are doing high-risk activities detectable on the web?

NeedsProduct and activity signals on the digital footprint
Claims & SIU

Was the insured operating at claimed capacity on the date of loss?

NeedsPoint-in-time activity signals + historical snapshots

Can I cross-check this claim against registries, taxonomies, and digital signals in one pass?

NeedsRegistry + digital-footprint fusion + multi-taxonomy classification
Chief Data Officer

What would my SMB classification accuracy be on a full re-match against the live universe?

NeedsMatch & Enrich against 135M operating companies

How many of my unknown-entity flags clear with one global firmographic provider?

NeedsGlobal coverage + digital and registry fusion
Fraud & KYB

Which applicants bound last month have no digital footprint despite claiming active operations?

NeedsDigital footprint verification + dormancy signals

How many bound policies sit on entities whose ownership shifted since bind, raising a sanctions flag?

NeedsOwnership change detection across registries + digital footprint

In production

From submission to claim.

New business

WorkflowQuote > Risk assessment > Underwriting decision
Where traditional data vendors break

Long-tail SMBs are thin and miscoded in registries. Underwriters burn hours on manual validation.

What Veridion does

Match & Enrich resolves every submission against 135M operating companies, classified across every mainstream taxonomy.

The delta
Before15%SMB match rate
With Veridion96%SMB match rate

Try asking your book this

Of my new SMB submissions this week, how many are in the long tail my current vendor cannot match?

Proof

Northbridge, top-10 Canadian P&C carrier

Data depth

The data that makes this possible.

Coverage

Continuous refresh, 135M operating companies

Book-wide change detection. Not annual pulls.
Entity

Registry + digital footprint, fused

Dormancy, shell, and ownership mismatches surfaced at KYB.
Classification

Product-level granularity

Mid-term drift on lithium-ion, hazardous, heavy machinery lines.
Ownership

Ultimate parent across registries and the digital footprint

Sanctions flags within the week of change, not at next renewal.
Location

Site-level location graph

Aggregation exposure, flood and wildfire zone flagging per site.
ESG

Classified to UNEP FI taxonomy

Climate-tilt pricing. Disclosure-ready provenance on every signal.

Taxonomy breadth

Every coding system on your rate tables.

Underwriting, rating, and regulatory filing each run on different coding systems. Veridion classifies every operating company against all of them in parallel, with confidence scores per field.

NAICS

North American Industry Classification

US regulatory filings, ISO rates

SIC

Standard Industrial Classification

Legacy US; embedded in carrier systems

ISIC

Intl. Standard Industrial Classification

UN standard for cross-border books

NACE

Nomenclature of Economic Activities

EU baseline, carriers and reinsurers

NCCI

National Council on Compensation Insurance

Workers-comp class codes

IBC

Insurance Bureau of Canada

Canadian commercial-lines codes

UNSPSC

UN Standard Products & Services

Product / procurement taxonomy

Veridion

Proprietary business tags

Finer-grained activity beyond standard schemes

Custom taxonomies
Have a proprietary class scheme? Send Veridion the taxonomy and every operating company is mapped to it. No rating-engine re-platform.

Governance

Auditable by design.

  • Robots.txt-compliant sourcing. No personal data. Every attribute is traceable to the source signal that produced it.
  • Ownership links support aggregation-exposure and sanctions screening across the global registry + digital footprint.
  • Confidence scores and signal provenance are exposed on every field so regulatory data-quality reviews land clean.

FAQ

Commercial insurance, answered.

Next step

See the data before you commit.

Run a data-quality review against your current enrichment layer. Attribute fill-rate, match-rate delta, freshness gap on your actual book of business.

Solutions

Explore other solutions

Each workflow runs on the same living company intelligence. Pick the one closest to your team's problem.