Solutions / Third-party risk
The best third-party risk platforms win on data. Veridion powers the best.
642M companies across 166M locations. Registry entities linked with operational ones. A complete picture for procurement, compliance, sanctions, and sustainability teams working in TPRM platforms.
Trusted by global intelligence, risk, and procurement teams
The gap
Every function runs on data that goes stale.
Registries tell you what a counterparty once was. Sanctions lists tell you who was flagged, as of last refresh. Veridion comes in to paint a complete picture.
Your supplier list is a snapshot. Exposure is live.
A 40K-supplier book audited every ten months is stale before the hurricane lands or the tariff drops. Traditional data vendors return addresses in affected regions. You need facility-level function: which supplier actually runs the component plant you buy from, which one just opened a new line you have not priced in.
Our strong point
Continuously refreshed locations, activity, and corporate linkage across 135M operating companies. Not quarterly registry pulls.
Global coverage
Veridion helps you break down entire supply chains.
One Airbus aircraft programme, traced from final assembly in Toulouse back through three tiers to composite, chemical, and aluminum suppliers across six European countries. Every facility is typed, jurisdiction-bound, continuously refreshed.
Blind spots
Questions only Veridion can answer
Each one goes dark on registry-only, sanctions-list-only, or platform-only data.
Of 40K suppliers, how many changed what, where, or who owns them in 30 days in ways that matter for the contract?
For a disruption this week, which suppliers are exposed at facility level, not just "has an address in the region"?
How many active suppliers are dormant shells, clean on paper with zero operational signal?
How many duplicate records do I carry because the same legal entity shows up as three vendor IDs under name variance?
Which of my spend concentrations would consolidate at parent-group level once hierarchy is resolved?
Which suppliers carry claimed green certs (FSC, ISO 13485, ISO 22000)?
Which supplier facilities are in UFLPA-scope forced-labor regions at facility level, not just the HQ?
Can I auto-populate the KYB form with normalized legal name, jurisdiction, reg ID, activity, and ownership, verified against registries and the digital footprint in one call?
Of the entities I KYB-ed 12 months ago, how many are materially different today across owners, activity, or locations?
For a suspected shell, is there any digital operational signal on the transaction date?
A parent is sanctioned overnight. Which customers, suppliers, or counterparties am I exposed to owned directly or through four layers of holdings?
Which entities share an owner with a recently sanctioned individual even when registries do not flag them?
Of my adverse-media alerts, which resolve to an operational entity versus a dormant shell?
In production
From onboarding to cascade alert.
Portfolio monitoring + disruption
Supplier masters rot between ten-month audits. When Hurricane Milton hits or a tariff ships on Monday, traditional data vendors return "has an address in the region." Not the facility that runs the line.
Continuously refreshed firmographics, function-typed locations, and activity tags across 135M operating companies. Event-triggered exposure sweeps drop to facility level in the same query.
Try asking your book this
Which Tier-1 facilities are exposed this week, not which HQs?
Proof
A client delivered 140,805 locations across 3,455 companies, each typed by function and attributed to source
Data depth
The data layer that makes this possible.
- Coverage
- Book-wide change detection. Not quarterly pulls.
- Locations
- Exposure at the site that runs the line. Not the HQ.
- Ownership
- Sanctions cascade across corporate-family depth.
- Activity
- Does this facility actually make the input you buy?
- Digital
- Dormancy and shell detection from absence, not just presence.
- ESG
- CSRD, UFLPA, CBAM evidence that reaches the audit trail.
135M operating companies, 250 countries, continuous refresh
166M facilities, function-typed (manufacturing, distribution, R&D, office, logistics, partner)
507M legal entities, fused registry + digital graph, ownership event stream
Multi-NAICS + SIC, ISIC, NACE, NCCI, IBC, UNSPSC, proprietary tags, 1.3B products and services
Website telemetry, employee signals, press velocity, adverse media
Scores, GHG, commitments, adverse media, facility-level data, FSC / ISO 13485 / ISO 22000
Customer impact
What changes when the data is current.
Customer story
A second featured customer impact story will render here once the customerImpact fetcher is wired.
The lifecycle
Source. Manage. Monitor. One data layer underneath all three.
Third-party risk is step. Supplier sourcing handles pre-contract discovery. Vendor management keeps the master clean. The same vendor IDs that travel across all three.
Continuous risk monitoring.
Sanctions cascade, perpetual KYB, ESG breaches, financial distress, ownership changes. The trigger that re-opens the sourcing loop.
- +Perpetual KYB across 190+ jurisdictions
- +Sanctions cascade through the corporate group
- +Operational disruption signals
- +Triggers re-sourcing on the same data layer
Integration
Four surfaces, one contract.
KYB prefill + ongoing verification
Resolve and enrich counterparties in flight with 50+ legal, digital, and activity attributes.
Supplier discovery + cohort sweep
Pivot from an exposure list to a qualified alternative-supplier shortlist by activity, facility, and jurisdiction.
Corporate family
Resolve parent and subsidiary across corporate-family depth for sanctions cascade work.
Portfolio normalization + refresh
Bring a 40K-supplier master into a clean, continuously maintained graph with change flags on locations, activity, and ownership.
Governance
Auditable by design.
- Robots.txt-compliant sourcing. No personal data. Every attribute is traceable to the source signal that produced it.
- Confidence scores and signal provenance surface on every field, so regulatory data-quality reviews land against a provenance trail, not a black box.
FAQ
Third-party risk, answered.
Next step
See the data before you commit.
Run a third-party risk data review on a defined subset of your counterparty book. Entity resolution coverage, corporate-family depth, and attribute freshness against your current tool.
Solutions
Explore other solutions
Each workflow runs on the same living company intelligence. Pick the one closest to your team's problem.