Skip to main content

Customer story

Resolving Securitizations to the Companies Worth Rating

How a structured-finance rating agency mapped every entity, role and ownership link behind a deal from the live company graph, and verified it against SEC filings.

Structured-finance rating agency · Global · June 2026Credit & Data

Many of the names on the agency's input list weren't operating companies at all; they were the deals themselves: securitization trusts and SPVs, which standard matching has nothing to resolve. Veridion resolved each instrument to the operating entities behind it, classified every one by its role, enriched the records, and verified the result against public filings.

  1. 1
    Solved for names that aren't companies

    securitization trusts and SPVs that standard matching can't resolve, across 7 asset classes

  2. 2
    Mapped 1:many relationships

    each deal resolved to the full network of operating entities behind it in the company knowledge graph

  3. 3
    Identified every role

    ~13 role types per structure: parent, investment manager, sponsor, originator, SPV, depositor, loan-seller

  4. 4
    Enriched the records

    62 firmographic attributes per entity, across 21 countries and 327 NAICS codes

  5. 5
    Verified against filings

    every mapping justified and checked against SEC filings and rating-agency reports

  6. 6
    Pinpointed the data source

    for each deal, the one public company whose disclosures you'd pull firmographics and ESG from

When the names on the list aren't companies

The agency rates and surveils structured-finance deals, and its data workflows begin where most do: with a list of entities to match against a reference dataset and enrich. The list arrived looking ordinary: names to be resolved to companies.

But many of those names were not companies. They were the deals themselves: securitization trusts and special-purpose vehicles behind everything from Non-QM RMBS and multi-bank CMBS conduits to aviation and auto ABS, CRE CLOs, and even a stadium-backed French securitization fund. Each is a legal box created to hold assets and issue securities, deliberately ring-fenced from the institutions that built it, so standard company matching has nothing to grab onto, and the instrument either fails to resolve or matches to the wrong thing.

Resolving it is only half the job: to act on a deal, the agency also needs to know which entity behind it carries the disclosures worth pulling credit and ESG data from.

Resolved to the entities behind the deal, by role

Veridion resolved each instrument against its company knowledge graph to the full network of entities behind it, classifying every one by its role, with the taxonomy adapting to the structure rather than forcing a fixed template.

A multi-bank CMBS conduit unrolls into several originating banks, each of their loan-seller subsidiaries, and a separate depositor. A private-equity-owned auto ABS has no single ultimate parent at all, so the mapping separates ownership from advice: the funds that own the originator, the manager that administers them, and the sub-adviser that directs investment yet owns nothing, a distinction naive matching gets wrong.

Each resolved entity was enriched with 62 firmographic attributes, spanning 21 countries and 327 NAICS codes. And for every deal, Veridion flagged the single public company whose disclosures the agency would actually pull firmographic and ESG data from, typically the listed parent or REIT, since the SPV itself discloses nothing.

Every mapping carries a written justification and was verified against SEC filings and rating-agency reports, corrections included, where an unchecked assumption would have named the wrong entity.

Start from a deal, get the companies behind it

The agency can start from a deal name and get back the operating companies behind it: each classified by role, enriched, filing-verified, and with the one to source data from flagged.

Entity resolution no longer breaks at the point where an input stops being a company and becomes a financial instrument, and because every mapping arrives with its reasoning attached, an analyst can audit the structure rather than take it on faith.

The same approach extends to any workflow that begins with a deal or instrument name: rating and surveillance, counterparty diligence, and beneficial-ownership mapping in structured finance.

Seven asset classes, each resolved to the entities behind the instrument
Asset classWhat a name match sawWhat Veridion resolved
Multi-bank CMBS conduitOne unresolvable trust nameSeveral originating banks, their loan-seller subsidiaries, a separate depositor
Auto ABS (PE-owned)No single parent to matchOwning funds, the manager, the sub-adviser; ownership separated from advice
Non-QM RMBSA securitization vehicleOriginator, servicer and sponsor chain
CRE CLOA ring-fenced issuerParent to US holding to platform to listed REIT (data source flagged)
Aviation ABSAn SPV with no disclosuresOperating lessor and its parent
Prime jumbo RMBSA trust nameOriginator and program sponsor
Stadium-backed FCTA French securitization fundAMF-licensed management company and venue operator
By the numbers
7Asset classes resolved
~13Role types per structure
3 → 62Inputs enriched to attributes
62Firmographic attributes per entity
21Countries spanned
327NAICS 2022 codes

Customer impact

Apply these outcomes to your own context.

Same infrastructure, different use case. Tell us what your team is trying to solve and we'll scope what's possible.