Grata & SourceScrub Alternatives for PE Deal Sourcing

If you're comparing Grata competitors for private equity deal sourcing, Veridion, PitchBook, Inven, S&P Capital IQ Pro and Gain.pro are among the alternatives to consider. 

Some focus on finding private companies, others combine company discovery with financial and transaction research, while others support sourcing through data integrated into your own systems. 

This article compares the five alternatives by company coverage, data freshness, search capabilities, access options and pricing.

Grata and SourceScrub Alternatives at a Glance

Grata, SourceScrub, Veridion, PitchBook, Inven, S&P Capital IQ Pro and Gain.pro all support private company discovery and research, but differ in the markets they cover, how they refresh company information and how you access their data. 

Veridion

Veridion is a company data provider that supplies private company data for investment screening and market research. 

You can search companies through its Playground or connect the data to proprietary sourcing systems through APIs and batch delivery. Its private equity solution supports searches based on investment criteria, including industry, company size and ownership.

Veridion's key features for deal sourcing include:

Here’s an example of how these features work in practice. 

A US financial-data provider wanted to find investable private companies its clients weren’t yet tracking, including pre-PE and pre-VC businesses, and see which of them were gaining momentum. 

Its existing data relied on static financials and registration records, which show where a company has been but miss early growth signals. 

Veridion compared snapshots of the same companies over time to build signals around hiring, geographic expansion, reputation trends and headquarters moves, then combined them into a single investability score. 

Of 1,670 companies with detected HQ or footprint moves, 1,209 (72%) weren’t on the provider’s existing list, and 992 showed footprint growth with a median increase of 111%.

Among Grata alternatives, Veridion places more emphasis on supplying company data for proprietary sourcing systems, though its Playground also supports direct searches. 

Grata concentrates more of the sourcing process in its own platform. The distinction matters most for firms building internal screening models or combining several datasets.

The main limitation is that data confidence varies across company types and regions. 

Veridion's data methodology notes that micro-companies and businesses in sparse-data regions may have lower confidence. Undisclosed private company financials may also be modelled, while some lower-priority information can take days or weeks to reach the dataset.

Veridion does not publish fixed prices. Pricing varies by data coverage, usage, delivery method, services and customization requirements.

PitchBook

PitchBook is a private capital market research platform covering companies, investors, funds and transactions. 

If you source PE or VC deals, its company and deal screening tools let you identify potential investments and then examine their financing, ownership and transaction history within the same platform.

PitchBook's key features for deal sourcing include:

In Tesi’s sourcing example, the team identifies Finnish businesses in its target sectors and examines funding dates and time in existing investors’ portfolios, drawing on PitchBook's financing and deal records.

The sourcing process is visible in Tarsadia Investments' experience. 

The firm uses PitchBook's screeners to reduce millions of companies to a small group of prospects. In one instance, vice president Jay Santoro found a company through an incumbent investor's portfolio, obtained the CEO and co-founder's contact information and made a cold approach that eventually led to a deal.

PitchBook combines company discovery with detailed transaction records, financing histories and investor research. Grata focuses more on identifying middle-market private businesses. PitchBook is particularly useful when your sourcing process involves examining previous deals and the investors behind them.

PitchBook's main limitations are coverage gaps and cost. Recent Capterra reviews indicate that coverage is limited for certain illiquid private investments. A lower-middle-market PE associate also rated PitchBook's value for money 3/5 despite rating the product highly overall, pointing to cost as something to watch out for.

PitchBook does not publish standard subscription prices. Pricing is customized, so prospective customers need to contact sales.

Inven

Inven is an AI-based company search and market-mapping platform built for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) research. 

For PE teams, you can describe an investment thesis in natural language, identify private companies matching it and qualify the resulting list using company, ownership and transaction data.

Inven's key features for deal sourcing include:

Inven's search covers 28M+ companies across 160+ markets, and a verified PE user on G2 specifically identified the AI Screener as valuable for list qualification.

There is a concrete PE example behind those features. Netherlands-based Lexar Partners previously assembled target lists through manual web research. 

With Inven, the firm reports reducing a full day of sourcing to 15–30 minutes, making the process roughly 10× faster and turning it into a weekly routine across the firm. It also reports finding companies in niche international searches where another platform had struggled.

For firms considering SourceScrub competitors, Inven puts more emphasis on natural-language discovery and AI-assisted qualification. 

SourceScrub builds private company intelligence partly from its researched source network, while Inven is designed around describing a thesis, generating a company universe and screening that universe inside an AI-led workflow.

The main limitation is the accuracy of contact data. 

In a September 2025 G2 review, a verified private equity user sourcing lower-middle-market acquisition targets reported occasional inaccuracies in contact data. Another reviewer, Miles T., raised similar concerns about contact information drawn from LinkedIn. Firms preparing outreach lists may need to verify decision-maker details independently.

Inven does not publish standard subscription prices. Prospective customers need to contact the company for pricing based on their requirements.

S&P Capital IQ Pro

S&P Capital IQ Pro is a financial and market intelligence platform covering public and private companies, investors and transactions. 

Its database includes 60M+ private companies, making it relevant to PE teams researching acquisition targets, company financials, ownership structures and deal activity.

S&P Capital IQ Pro's key features for deal sourcing include:

For firms maintaining proprietary sourcing models, S&P Global's private company data services also support API and data-feed delivery.

An Asia-based PE firm adopted Capital IQ Pro to research potential investments, identify buyers and co-investors and examine opportunities across industries. Its investment team also used the platform's fund and transaction intelligence to support investment research. 

The case illustrates how company discovery and wider financial research can form part of the same sourcing process.

Grata and SourceScrub concentrate more directly on private company discovery, particularly in the middle market. S&P Capital IQ Pro combines company screening with financial analysis, transaction research and public market intelligence. 

It suits PE teams that want to examine a potential acquisition's financial position and comparable deals within the same platform.

The main limitation is a weaker fit for smaller, founder-owned targets. 

Although Capital IQ Pro covers millions of private companies, financial disclosure varies across businesses. Its emphasis on financial statements and transactions may be less useful when sourcing smaller, founder-owned companies with limited public information. 

The platform's extensive capabilities may also exceed the requirements of teams focused primarily on building target lists.

S&P Global does not publish standard Capital IQ Pro subscription prices. Contact its sales team for a quote based on the required data and services.

Gain.pro

Gain.pro is a private market intelligence platform for finding and researching companies, deals and investors. 

For PE sourcing, you can search for businesses matching an investment thesis, then examine their financials, ownership and M&A history before deciding which targets merit further research.

Gain.pro's key features for deal sourcing include:

Gain.pro's thesis-based discovery follows a broader PE sourcing approach in which firms use firmographic data to build deal pipelines around defined investment criteria.

Gain.pro also distinguishes between analyst-curated and GenAI company profiles. Curated profiles cover sizable independent businesses, including companies meeting thresholds such as €50 million+ revenue, €5 million+ EBITDA or 250+ employees. 

Smaller businesses are primarily covered through GenAI profiles assembled from company websites, LinkedIn, legal-entity records and Gain.pro's existing classification data.

Gain.pro overlaps with Grata and SourceScrub in target discovery but adds detailed financial, ownership and transaction research around the companies you find. 

Its distinction from PitchBook is narrower: both support private market research, while Gain.pro combines analyst-curated profiles with GenAI coverage for smaller businesses.

The main limitation is that not all financial figures are reported. Gain states, “AI estimates revenue and EBITDA to fill any gaps.” Check whether a target’s financial figures are reported or estimated when comparing acquisition candidates.

Gain.pro does not publish standard subscription prices. Pricing is custom and requires contacting the company.

Conclusion

The right alternative depends on how your firm sources deals. A dedicated sourcing platform may suit teams that want to find and qualify targets in one place. 

For research involving transactions, investors and financing, a broader private market database may be useful. Firms with proprietary sourcing models should also consider how easily company data integrates into their existing systems.

Shortlist two or three platforms and test them against companies you already know. Check whether they appear in the results, how complete their records are and when the information was last updated.